Partner Spotlight

After FTX, counterparty risk stopped being theoretical

FTX made counterparty risk concrete. Catapult Trade settles trades against synthetic charts, not human counterparties — removing one whole category of risk

BEFORE NOVEMBER 2022, most retail futures traders didn’t think much about counterparty risk. Exchange collapse was an edge case that happened to smaller, shadier operations. Then FTX happened, and the reality that funds on any centralized exchange are an unsecured claim against that exchange became impossible to ignore.

The structural response from most traders was to spread exposure across exchanges and avoid keeping more on any single platform than they needed for active trading. It’s a reasonable mitigation. It doesn’t change the underlying risk.

Catapult Trade approaches this differently. The platform uses on-chain settlement with embedded wallets and an operator staking model. If a chart fails to run correctly the smart contract automatically refunds all open positions from the operator stake, without a support ticket or a claims process. Withdrawals go to your own wallet address across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Solana, Base, BNB Chain, and others. The counterparty risk profile is structurally different from having funds on an exchange balance sheet.

The other structural differences follow the same pattern of removing specific risks that centralized futures trading carries by default.

Funding rates on perpetual futures are a continuous cost that runs hardest against you when you’re most confident in a position. Catapult Trade has no funding mechanism. The fee structure is 1% on collateral and 4% on winning position profit — fixed, calculable before entry, unchanging while the position is open.

Mark price liquidations on standard exchanges use external indices that diverge from chart prices during volatility. Liquidations at levels that look wrong are a routine futures trading experience. On Catapult Trade liquidation price is calculated from entry, leverage, and a fixed published buffer. The number shown is the number that applies.

Execution quality on futures exchanges depends on position size — large orders move the market against you. On Catapult Trade there’s no orderbook. Size has no effect on execution price.

The honest limitation is that Catapult Trade charts are synthetic. Real BTC or ETH exposure requires a real asset. For traders using futures for leverage mechanics and price pattern reading rather than specific asset exposure, the structural advantages are genuine. For traders who specifically need real market exposure, Catapult Trade is a different product rather than a substitute.

Recent Posts

How better planning leads to more efficient commercial spaces

Better planning turns commercial spaces into environments that are easier to use, cheaper to run, and more adaptable over time

2 days ago

The role of aggregator platforms in Canada’s gaming market

The aggregator model has become the preferred way Canadians engage with online gaming entertainment

2 days ago

London Inc. Weekly

London Inc. Weekly: A summary of regional business news from the past week

2 days ago

Dispatch

Dispatch: A summary of recent business appointments and announcements, plus upcoming events for the week ahead

2 days ago

Can remote work help solve the fertility crisis?

As countries worldwide seek ways to offset declining birth rates, researchers say a widespread remote-work model could provide a sizable…

4 days ago

How employee-owned businesses could shake up Canada’s business scene

Employee ownership trusts are here to stay. That’s a good thing

5 days ago